Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Hostel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 02:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Love Hostel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Love Hostel

Article about unreleased film that does not satisfy film notability guidelines or general notability guidelines. The article does not speak for itself (because there is no reception because the film isn't released). A review of the references reveals that they are simply advance publicity about the movie, not independent or secondary.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Can be created should it meet WP:NFILM. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 08:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify per WP:ATD-I. May not meet NFF yet but would be just 4 days away from its scheduled release by the time the discussion closes. Alternatively, a relist would allow reviews to be explored so that the participants can ultimately evaluate its notability. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC) Updated 06:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I would support a relist. A quick search shows that five news stories have been posted in the last 4-6 hours, so I think that it would be good to wait and see if more sourcing becomes available. I'll try and see if I can improve the page as well. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm leaning towards keep on this one, but want to improve the article further. At the very least this should be relisted so that we can see if there are any new sources. The coverage for this looks to be plentiful enough as far as coverage of filming goes. There are puff pieces, but there is also coverage of some minor controversy - the filming was halted twice due to farmer protests. I have a strong feeling that there will be reviews once this releases. That's crystal balling, so I'm going to try and find more sourcing in the meantime. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've expanded the production section greatly and this seems to pass NFF at this point in time. I'm not entirely comfortable with the keep, so I would highly recommend that this be relisted to see if more sourcing becomes available. I'm also fine with this being draftified. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The coverage seems to keep coming in and my keep is a lot firmer now, as a lot of the papers are falling over themselves to write about, interview, and otherwise cover the film and its actors. If this doesn't get at least a handful of reviews I'll honestly be shocked. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep meets NFILM after release. Added 5+ full reviews from reliable sources. Courtesy ping to previous participants -- Ab207 (talk) 06:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as a Heymann case. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: per above. Film now have reviews from reliable sources.  Ts12rAc talk to me 08:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.