Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Is A Battlefield: Poem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Love Is A Battlefield: Poem

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Bringing this to AfD after declining my own prod (found it had already been prodded previously). The author of the poem is apparently notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia Tony Hanes, but I don't feel the poem needs an article by itself. I've removed the text of the poem from the article as a copyvio (and removed a copyvio tag). Peridon (talk) 17:44, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. And I question the author's notability and will be PRODing him shortly as well. Inks.LWC (talk) 17:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No claim of notability, even if the poet himself is notable, which is doubtful. ---  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive  17:51, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - completely unremarkable poem from a self-published author. After Inks.LWC's PROD was removed on Tony Hanes by this article's creator, I have now nominated that for deletion as well. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Love Is a Battlefield. Poinkie (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Why? Love Is a Battlefield is about the song, not this poem. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-notable poem by dubiously-notable poet. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment the poem itself can be moved to wikisource.Curb Chain (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would we do that when there is no indication of notability? ---  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 16:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * And when the text has been removed because of copyvio? --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 19:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.