Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Is Everything (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Christmas Kisses (EP). A side note that the meaning of SK#1 has changed several times in the last year with respect to redirects at AfD. czar 07:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Love Is Everything (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable songs fails any ounce of third party notability. Minor chart placements in Netherlands/UK are easily merged in the parent discography article. — I B  [ Poke ] 09:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 *  Delete Redirect - NSONG states charting will "suggest that a song or single may be notable", it is clear that there is really nothing sourced to say about this song that cannot fit into the parent article. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I have created a new chart at Christmas Kisses (EP) reflecting the charting. (I did not copy the chart. I checked the sources and generated a new one, using only the formatting of the original chart.) There is nothing to merge. Redirects are cheap. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Nomination proposes merging some content to another article. This is incompatible with deletion. --Michig (talk) 06:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I assume you are referring to WP:SPEEDYKEEP #1 and believe this is really a merge request. However, "and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted" applies. Yes, you could argue that this should be a merge request. No one would see it. Feel free to copy that chart info over, then there is nothing to merge. "Problem" solved. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 19:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If, as the nomination appears to advocate, that chart info was copied over there we would need to redirect to preserve attribution, so this discussion could not be closed as delete, i.e. it's the wrong forum. The nominator could just have done the merge, redirected, and saved having this discussion. --Michig (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Good lord, read again. I'm clearly saying to delete this because it fails WP:NSONGS. Along with it I mentioned that the chart placement can be included in the discogaphy page. Nowhere I asked to have it be redirected. — I B  [ Poke ] 11:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Re-read your nomination ("Minor chart placements in Netherlands/UK are easily merged in the parent discography article."). Do you not understand that merging content requires a redirect? --Michig (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Too late to save having this discussion. We're already here. Does anyone feel we should do anything other than redirect to the EP? - Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Far be it from me to suggest that you've copied the content there and tidied it up, but if there is agreement that nothing is getting merged it would be better to delete as this title given that anyone searching for this song will end up at the disambiguation page Love Is Everything, where the entry should be altered to link to the EP article. --Michig (talk) 15:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I won't stoop so low as to mention my opponent's drinking problem, but I went to the sources, created a new chart... then referred to the old one to clean up my crappy chart-fu. I'm stunned that anyone else came up with the novel idea that "love is everything". Other than Grande fans in the Ukraine, I suppose most traffic should go to the disamb page. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: This article can be improved by expanding its content. Some people think that it should be deleted simply because it's too empty. Actually, it doesn't fail WP:NSONG. Deletion or redirection is not the best and appropriate choice. U990467 16:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment "A standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." If you feel there is sufficient material in reliable sources, now would be the time to add it. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * User:U990467, you have no idea about WP:NSONGS based on your comment "Some people think that it should be deleted simply because it's too empty. Actually, it doesn't fail WP:NSONG" and I suggest you re-read it and try to understand. This article has no notability other than a minor chart placement. — I B  [ Poke ] 07:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Christmas Kisses (EP). Non-notable song. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 23:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect as not at all convincing of actual independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.