Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Land (Chongqing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. X clamation point  04:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Love Land (Chongqing)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable theme park KuroiShiroi (contribs) 18:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Undid closure per this, but I still withdraw my delete vote. 黒い白い (KuroiShiroi) 00:21, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL or WP:HOAX, doesn't matter which. Drawn Some (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment -//- Neither WP:CRYSTAL or WP:HOAX apply. Proxy User (talk) 21:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as per Drawn Some. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment -//- Neither WP:CRYSTAL or WP:HOAX apply. Proxy User (talk) 21:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete until the park is completed.Rirunmot (talk) 19:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, tempted to call WP:HOAX. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 19:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * KEEP! Not a HOAX! For those of you who are claiming it is a hoax, shame on you, a quick Google search would have given you plenty of article about it. I have added one to the article. Also see Love Land. The Age of Bronze (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Here are lots more articles - The Age of Bronze (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, I just ran across a link for it here]. That there is pretty notable for me. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. OK, so we have multiple, reliable sources verifying the park's existence and the fact that it should open later in 2009. Under WP:CRYSTAL, we should really hold the article until then so that a more solid assertion of notability can be made. At the moment, I am not seeing much... Eddie.willers (talk) 20:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - the local authorities have ordered the park to be closed and demolished., 60.229.42.146 (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What an unsatisfying climax... The Age of Bronze (talk) 09:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * KEEP - It is notable enough that the international media, as opposed to cable news hacks, have been giving it ongoing coverage. It's significant enough that people are coming to the wikipedia article after reading about it in the press. Somebody local might be able to fill in more information. 68.227.244.69 (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops... forgot to log in :D Iroll (talk) 14:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Extensive coverage of its early demolition Mayalld (talk) 16:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep -//- Extensive media coverage, notable event. Neither WP:CRYSTAL or WP:HOAX apply here. That it offends is not a reason to delete. Proxy User (talk) 19:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Extensive international coverage devoted to the opening (and immediate closing) of the park. --Madchester (talk) 00:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per New York Times front page story, which I've just added. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Useful information about Chinese attitude toward sex. See also NYTIMES discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.250.140.23 (talk) 14:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with the Korean article, as this article has little content, and it's doubtful if it will gain much more. 130.220.79.178 (talk) 05:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.