Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Lost But Not Forgotten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus / keep. Punkmorten 00:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Love Lost But Not Forgotten
Not notable, only one editor. 'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Deathphoenix' 21:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Let's lose and forget this one. Ruby 20:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Several titles at Amazon; full write-up at AllMusicGuide.  Oh no  itsJamie Talk 21:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ruby. Stifle 11:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. If they have multiple albums at Amazon, they are neither lost nor forgotten. It also means they fully qualify for the precious guidelines. -- JJay 21:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable enough for Allmusic.com bio and albums on sale. Capitalistroadster 03:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. They may technically meet guidelines, but that's why they're guidelines - not absolute law. Ifnord 15:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.