Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Money Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Bangerz. j⚛e deckertalk 14:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Love Money Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONGS grossly. It does not have any third party notability, which is essential for WP:GNG. It is not a commercial success and devoid of placement on any of the national record charts, has not received third party critical reception. Only instance of achieving is from the first party (Miley Cyrus') mouth intself, which is where it fails NSONGS. Hence this should be deleted, or best kept as a plausible redirect to Bangerz. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 09:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Bangerz as a plausible search term, but a WP:CFORK that doesn't warrant a separate article.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 22:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:42, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect. I'm not convinced that these album-only non-charting tracks are ever really going to be notable (maybe if they are the subject of a particular controversy, or maybe if they are the output of a much-studied band/from a much-studied album). I can't see any good reason to assume that this one is. J Milburn (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Per WP:NSONGS: "If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created." That description seems to fit here, as all existing coverage from independent reliable sources occurs within the context of the parent album.  Gongshow   talk  17:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.