Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Story (Katharine McPhee song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Spartaz Humbug! 04:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Love Story (Katharine McPhee song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

The song fails WP:NSONGS, it failed to chart and is unlikely to grow beyond a stub Aspects (talk) 23:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Aspects (talk) 23:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure. It was officially the second single. It was played on the radio and charted in the 60s on Mediabase's Pop chart and a video was made that was played on TRL and MTV Asia. Plus, it sold over 77,000 downloads. I wouldn't say it had high notability, but it seems notable enough as an official single to have its own article as part of information about its album. I'd like to hear other opinions before I decide what to vote. Ducold (talk) 04:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Here is a Billboard review of the song .  Gongshow  Talk 00:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Since Gongshow already found at least one reliable source from which the article can be expanded, I see no reason to believe that the article is unlikely to grow beyond a stub. Rlendog (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 15:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: One source is not enough. Joe Chill (talk) 19:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed to Keep: Per Gongshow. Joe Chill (talk) 23:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Here are two more sources for consideration.  Gongshow  Talk 19:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.