Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Triangle (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Love Triangle (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks full reviews or other coverage. Prod removed with the claim "has reviews" with no indication where these reviews might be. The article has none, IMDB has no critic reviews linked, rotten tomatoes has a single capsule review. Not enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jim  Car  ter  11:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Jim  Car  ter  11:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Needs a bit more input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found one lone review from the Chicago Reader, but this by itself is not enough to justify a keep. The only other sources were two extremely brief, trivial mentions in the same newspaper. This doesn't show a depth of coverage. That it's apparently tied to an attempt to promote Kevin L. Walker on Wikipedia doesn't help much either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- unremarkable film and a WP:PROMO page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.