Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Undone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Love Undone

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NWEB and WP:GNG, and I can't find any sources. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 21:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Internet. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 21:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nom, no independent sources can be found about this subject and no references are in the article other than the one award they had won. Harobouri • 🎢  • 🏗️ (he/him)  21:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, if I post links to the YouTube Channel, would that count as a source?
 * https://www.youtube.com/@uloveseries/featured Aquitar94 (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Their iMDB page is also here: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15545436/ Aquitar94 (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The youtube, no. The IMDB is useful in pointing to other sources that are reliable, but you can't use it for sourcing alone. Oaktree b (talk) 01:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Is a feature in Shadow and Act that discusses the series raising money for season 2 count? Also leads to a GoFundMe that was successfully funded. https://shadowandact.com/crowdfund-this-black-retail-criblore-a-horror-anthology-and-love-undone Aquitar94 (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The new sources provided do not meet general notability guidelines still. YouTube is both unreliable and the link provided is primary, which fails the independent from subject criteria. IMDB is independent, but per WP:IMDB, it is generally unreliable due to the fact it is user generated. The Shadow and Act source looks reliable, is independent, but does not significantly cover the subject. --Harobouri • 🎢  • 🏗️ (he/him)  03:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources found for the webseries, there are books mentioned in the New York Times that are unrelated to this series but they share the same theme. Oaktree b (talk) 01:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article's subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. I was unable to find any sources that would show notability. As far as WP:WEBCRIT, it isn't met in this case because an actor won an award, not the webseries itself, so that isn't met in this case. - Aoidh (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 10:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NWEB.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I discovered another award for the film, but it's not particularly significant on its own. Suitskvarts (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.