Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Witch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Naoko Takeuchi. JForget 00:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Love Witch

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable manga series. Fails WP:BK and WP:N. Prod removed by User:Malkinann with note of "Takeuchi's works are studied, per WP:BK#5"; same as with PQ Angels, Takeuchi is not "historically significant", she seems more of a one-hit wonder with some notabiltiy. However, the notability of Takeuchi and Sailor Moon do not confer instant notability to all of her other works. This is another short work that was dropped before completion, is unlicensed, and has achieved no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete rehashing my argument from PQ Angels. While Naoko Takeuchi is well known for her work on Pretty Soldier Sailor Moon, it is the only thing she is known for and is not "historically significant". To be "historically significant", one needs a large body of highly notable work which is regularly a subject of academic study instead of one highly successful work. This disqualifies the subject for criterion #5. —Farix (t &#124; c) 18:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Naoko Takeuchi, there is already a short summary on her wiki article page. - Knowledgekid87 15:39, 1 October 2009 (AT)
 * Redirect per Knowledgekid87, it seems like a reasonable compromise and since a summary is already there a merge isn't necessary. --  At am a  頭 20:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.