Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love for the Elderly (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Not huge evidence of notability, but I think it just makes it, and anyway the only possible alternative would be "no consensus", which would lead to the same end result. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Love for the Elderly
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article for very local organization. The Glamour and USA Today articles is just  mention in a general article--Glamour 1 of 31, USAToday, 1 of 10. Huff Post is worthless for notability. That leaves only local sources for a local organization.  DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep With (claimed) volunteers in 56 countries, the organization may not be that local, but even if it were - being featured on national TV (Rede Record in Brazil  and an interview with Harry Connick Jr in the US), in addition to cover story on American Profile  and regional coverage, are sufficient per WP:ORG. As for style and content, it truly needs some work, but that's nothing irreparable. -- IsaacSt (talk) 11:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Love for the Elderly has been on international television like Rede Record and regional coverage as well which abides by WP:ORG. It also operates globally to impact senior-aged citizens. --Mayamarks (talk) 03:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.