Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovefreekz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 01:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Lovefreekz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

one sentance makes an article? Alan -  talk  21:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment One E makes a word a sentence ;) --Fbifriday (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * ' Delete'  Fails WP:BAND As far as I can tell --Fbifriday (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am removing my vote as per DitzyNizzy's comment down below, I did not notice that part of the article. I now support Keep. --Fbifriday (talk) 23:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 22:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Keep - Rather ironically, in view of the above deletion rationale (which makes me thinks he didn't read it), per Wp:BAND: No2 reads, "Has had a charted single or album on any national music chart." He has a song that made No6 in the United Kingdom. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  23:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * feel free to expand the article with riliable sources, for now, it doesn't even pass WP:STUB Alan  -  talk  23:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - "In 2004 his single "Shine", re-creating a sample of the Electric Light Orchestra's 1979 track "Shine a Little Love", became an international club smash and was a Top 20 hit on Billboard's Hot Dance Airplay chart in 2005.The track also reached Number 6 in the UK Singles Chart." Yes it does.--Fbifriday (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. He had a top 10 hit. Clearly notable.--Michig (talk) 08:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. He at least appears to meet criterion #2 of WP:MUSICBIO; having a top 10 hit on the UK Singles Chart is notable. I prefer expansion over deletion in this case. Perhaps something from these pages (many of which are pay sites) might help.  Gongshow  Talk 16:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. This nomination is a waste of everyones' time.  WP:BEFORE would have avoided it.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Gongshow and Michig. That an article about a notable subject is a stub is reason to expand, not delete. Rlendog (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Second the Snow Keep - It is a very small stub but it meets WP:MUSICBIO.  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~  17:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.