Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lover in Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Lover in Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WP:NOTE. Search only turns up two reviews, both by the same person, Chris Beveridge. One of his reviews is already included in the article. Since both reviews are from the same person, they only count as one source. —Farix (t &#124; c) 19:40, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. All I found were illegal streaming sites. One review is not enough to establish notability. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.