Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low Hartburn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Low Hartburn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's just a neighborhood. Article content is appropriate for a community webpage, not for Wikipedia. WP:GEOLAND says that places like this should be considered according to WP:GNG, and GNG is not met by the article nor by my search for additional sources. creffett (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Looks like a marketing name used to sell houses in a less wealthy area close to Hartburn. 92.5.165.10 (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hartburn, County Durham or Delete clearly fails WP:GEOLAND since its not an administrative unit or even a settlement according to the Ordnance Survey.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.