Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low Income Resources (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ged UK  12:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Low Income Resources
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As per What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not a directory &mdash; of services or anything else. As per long standing consensus, such pages do not belong here. --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs)  01:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's reasoning. Safiel (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. I PRODed this, but the prod was declined, with no reason stated. DES (talk) 01:25, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment btw, my decline of prod was procedural, I was actually trying to open an AfD, but you beat me to it. Safiel (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Then why not allow the prod to stand and see if it held, and avoid the need for this discussion? DES (talk) 01:25, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: I was wondering why you declined a straight forward nomination (and the question by DES above). Anyway, thanks for informing me. --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs)  01:26, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. While I do admire that someone cared enough to compile this list, I don't think that Wikipedia is an appropriate location for this. We're not a soapbox or place to promote anything, regardless of how noble or good the intentions are. I am a bit concerned that there are multiple people uploading this list onto various accounts, as I deleted a similar list at User:AACI's Low Income Resource as a promotional userpage. I'm going to open up an SPI, as I'm concerned that there might be a network of people spamming for the various LIR locations. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Although I do have to say that I personally view this as promotional in tone, as the wording in several sections of the article is blatantly promotional for the companies plus the nature of the list is to promote people using the services. (See phrases such as "Therefore, Hospice of the Valley ensures all families receive expert, quality, compassionate care and support, regardless of ability to pay." ) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Sorry about the prod decline yesterday. I have recently dealt with some malformed AfD nominations and mistakenly thought that this was one. Safiel (talk) 18:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Well intentioned but not appropriate per nominator. Sportfan5000 (talk) 22:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.