Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low Viscosity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Low Viscosity

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article was originally deleted as CSD A7. Restored per request on IRC en-help. Notability of the subject isn't clear and subject fails WP:MUSIC. Subject barely meets WP:GNG as far as multiple source (2) but the sources are pretty mundane and routine coverage. v/r - TP 19:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Without solid references, seems a bit of a fluid situation... at the moment deletion looks the only permissible choice but if better citations can be found I'll be happy to look at this again. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As an an article that does not have reliable sources and is not notable. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete then Redirect to Viscosity where low viscosity is explained adequately. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I cannot find any evidence that this guy meets WP:MUSIC or WP:GNG. --sparkl!sm hey! 14:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.