Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low cost housing in Pakistan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Nja 247 08:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Low cost housing in Pakistan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-sourced essay; appears to be original research mhking (talk) 01:56, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is has a couple of sources but no citations but it isn't really original research. It should be improved, not deleted, there are plenty of reliable resources to support notability and verify an article in addition to the ones listed. Drawn Some (talk) 03:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * keep - But perhaps renaming the article "Low cost housing projects in Pakistan"?

There certainly is an ongoing process, need, and developement of it, and it's among the most important issues for contries like Pakistan.Nunamiut (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep I have read about Low cost housing in Pakistan. The two given sources are reliable and verifiable. Rirunmot (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Seems like a notable article...-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  01:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - original research/essay, not encyclopedic in style or content; don't think it's salvagable. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

 Keep Pakistan has had issues with low cost housing. Thrice in its history it has had to resettle literally millions of people in short order. Its a major issue in the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.152.22 (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I would support an article about any one of the individual companies or a government housing project in particular, but an article about low-cost housing in general is not very encyclopedic. Lesath2 (talk) 02:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I was hoping to recommend keeping this as a useful topic, but a careful read of the content shows that it is doesn't say anything other than a company is doing good stuff. Johnuniq (talk) 08:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - The topic can be recreated if there's new material, but the current material doesn't suggest enough notability to be a stand-alone topic. Shadowjams (talk) 09:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - Not a bad topic, but the article would require a fundamental rewrite to be salvageable. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.