Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowell Forensic Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lowell High School (San Francisco). ✗ plicit  00:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Lowell Forensic Society

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:ORGSIG, despite its claims of being the oldest speech and debate team in the United States, there is simply no significant coverage to be found for this organization. Most texts I could find are usually published by the school or alumni organization. Per WP:INHERITORG, despite its alumni list, no organization is inherently notable simply because of who they are associated with. I don't doubt that this is an important club within the school's history, but there is simply not enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. BriefEdits (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * DELETE- the high school article talks about this club that’s enough. WP:inheritorg only thing significant is the famous people which is not enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrmmll22 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the highschool page. Anyway, no indep evidence that The Incredible Hulk was a member! Ode+Joy (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Forensic Society section of high school's page. We also already have List of Lowell High School (San Francisco) alumni, and those two articles cover the relevant content of this article. The remaining content is un-cited, and there appear to be no additional references available to resolve that deficiency. One other issue: Earwig's Copyvio detector indicates the lead is potentially a copyvio, but since several websites use the same phrasing, it may be a case of citogenesis. — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.