Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lower jerk

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted. Cyrius|&#9998; 7 July 2005 23:51 (UTC)

Lower jerk
If I ruled the world, this thing would be speedied as patent, deliberately well-formatted nonsense. But since I don't, I feel compelled to drag it to VfD.

Oh, I mean: not verifiable, hoax, and possibly an insult page, though a very abstract one if that's the intent. JRM · Talk 6 July 2005 23:45 (UTC)


 * Delete nonsense -- Coneslayer 2005 July 6 23:47 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. --Scimitar 6 July 2005 23:50 (UTC)
 * Oh, I think it classifies for speedy as patent nonsense... --IByte 7 July 2005 00:59 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense --Henrygb 7 July 2005 01:53 (UTC)
 * Delete but not speediable - it's nonsense, but not patent nonsense. -- Jonel | Speak 7 July 2005 03:55 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 7 July 2005 08:06 (UTC)
 * Delete It's already been speedy deleted twice guys, is there any reason not to just do that again? Also if I could have protected the title to keep it from being created again I would have. - Taxman Talk July 7, 2005 17:42 (UTC)
 * You're right, I missed that; I didn't check for other speedies since this page unfortunately isn't, regardless of how I turn policy around. However, this is obviously going to be deleted with massive support, and it definitely can be speedied and/or protected afterwards as recreation of deleted content. JRM · Talk 7 July 2005 21:59 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.