Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loyola Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Luigi30 (&Tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;) 01:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Loyola Elementary School
I know we argue about high schools, but a completely non-notable? elementary school? please. To warrant a WP entry, it MUST BE NOTABLE. --Bachrach44 19:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. I think very few elementary schools would qualify as notable. Jasmol 00:39, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; I'm all for keeping HSs, but few Elementary Schools are notable. &mdash; RJH 01:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Schools/Arguments. Silensor 02:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No vote, but take a look at the nearby Cupertino_Union_School_District and the elementary schools it already has pages for.
 * Unsigned comment from User:69.181.82.102 who has been creating many elementary and middle school articles in the Cupertino area recently. 24.17.48.241 11:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Created about a half-dozen elementary and middle school articles.


 * 'keep and please do not confuse populartiy with notability Yuckfoo 05:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn school Catchpole 13:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge into school district or town if article is both below three sentances and lacks any sort of illustration, boxed info-template or picture when AFD is closed. This school, like all others, is an important public institution and should be written about somewhere, even if it cannot sustain an article on it's own. Presently people do create school articles containing neutral, verifiable information and it is impossible to delete them, even though many have a desire to do so. Rather than striving for an impossible consensus to delete any given school article, I feel it is always preferable and takes much less energy to merge the text of the article into an article about a suitable habitation or administrative unit: a city, county or state, or a school district of local education authority of other school system, while taking care not to delete the information contained in the article. If the article is merged, the current location should be replaced by a redirect, and the edit history maintained for future use. This is the baseline consensus that I feel was reached at WP:SCH. Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 14:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. Bahn Mi 00:16, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth, or consider merging as reward for recent "good behavior" by school deletionists. Kappa 04:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Christopher Parham (talk) 17:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Factually accurate. --Oldak Quill 22:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.