Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LuTran Pharmaceuticals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

LuTran Pharmaceuticals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet notability guidelines; I could not find any independent reliable sources about this company(the only sources offered are a press release and another type of promotional page). The fact that this company was founded in 2016 according to the article suggests it is too soon for an article about it. 331dot (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  17:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  17:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  17:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  17:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- corp spam with language such as "...He is a senior executive with over 30 years of experience in the complete drug development process..." Etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Here is a complete search of Ronald Griffith RC Research. Woarearume (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * — I'm not clear on what that has to do with the article being discussed. It is about a company, not a person or their research. 331dot (talk) 01:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That person is a company Director and Chief Science Officer. im proving the 30 years of experience point(mention above by K.e.coffman). Woarearume (talk) 20:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That might mean he merits an article, but not his company. And that was offered as an example of why deletion is warranted.331dot (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. promotional directory entry.  DGG ( talk ) 23:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.