Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lubi-Lubi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 11:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Lubi-Lubi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Really bad article asking for a TNT. Sungodtemple (talk) 17:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Isn't it customary to issue notifications when you do this? Like to the creator of the article?  Hasn't happened yet.
 * WP:PROD states in pertinent part: The article's creator or other significant contributors should ideally be left a message at their talk page(s) informing them of the proposed deletion. This should be done by adding the == Proposed deletion of Name of page ==



The article Name of page has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tag, or other appropriate text. If you use the above template, you do not need to add a section header, as the template will do this for you. Twinkle has an option (which can be configured as the default in Twinkle preferences) to inform the page creator.[4] 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 7&6=thirteen, note that the article creator was blocked nearly four years ago for persistent sockpuppetry and creation of blatantly nonsense articles, so notification was probably a waste of time in this case. Richard3120 (talk) 01:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep No valid reason was given for deletion. WP:IDON'TLIKEIT is not a valid reason.   AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP.    D r e a m Focus  18:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC) added Keep vote and would like to also point out  the article already has a reference proving this is a traditional folk song.    D r e a m Focus  01:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on my initial research and addition of news sources to the article, it seems appropriate to keep and revise this article to focus on the Lubi-Lubi song, for which [because] independent and reliable sources appear to exist, and to consider merging the description of the game into another article if reliable sources can be found. Beccaynr (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC) (updated due to Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus's contributions to the article and this discussion)
 * Comment Also, perhaps the title of the article can be updated to Lubi-Lubi (song) for greater clarity, because there are also Lubi-Lubi festivals. Beccaynr (talk) 01:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I concur that the nominator failed WP:BEFORE (Google Books search for Bicol song "Lubi-Lubi" suggests some coverage of the topic in, , ,  (that said, I could only get snippet views, so I am not 100% convinced the sources contain more than trivial mention of the topic, but one at least suggest the topic gets its own section/box). The article is nowhere near the shape bad enough for TNT although I couldn't find any references that a 'game' accompanying the song/dance actually exist. The nominator should be WP:TROUTed for not presenting their analysis of sources (BEFORE). PS. I did some c/e, removing description of this as a game, it doesn't seem to be described as such. The article should be less confusing now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  00:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  00:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  00:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to an article on Filipino folk songs. Oaktree b (talk) 02:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article needs a little expansion if ever. Other than that, it is good enough to pass WP:GNG with the sources indicated above and in the article. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons cited by User:Superastig <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 15:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.