Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luc Chikhani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Luc Chikhani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references, and seemingly no notability, only mentioned that he completed surgery on Trevor Rees-Jones, a low-importance bodyguard. Also has only two real links to it. Jjamesryan Jjamesryan (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF, or what would be the the equivalent for surgeons.  BakerStMD  T&#124;C 02:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - just needs improvements--87.242.202.85 (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Could use more information if available Billy Hathorn (talk) 14:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Weak keep This seems to be the case of a one-event claim to fame, but nothing else. There is only one third-party source here (and there used to be none), the others are articles by the subject. The BBC article and the book listed at #2 probably put this over the edge. The articles by him or about surgery that mention him aren't terribly helpful, unfortunately, and the text is still a bit thin. There were over 30 instances of his name in the Rees-Jones book, and I would encourage filling out the text in the article with more information from the sources listed. LaMona (talk) 02:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Update: LaMona (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - it now has 4 third party sources. The fact that there used to be none shows that it has improved since being nominated, and should therefore be kept. (I apologize if I should have put Comment instead of keep at the beginning of this vote, not sure if my old one still counts!) --87.242.202.85 (talk) 22:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Please do not vote more than once, please replace one of them with Comment. Vrac (talk) 01:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. Apologies again, I'm new here! --87.242.202.85 (talk) 15:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep: Something of a one-trick pony in terms of notability but with the journal paper and interview I think he scrapes by WP:GNG. Vrac (talk) 01:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.