Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luc Harvey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NAC, result was keep, nomination withdrawn. Members of major political bodies are almost always inherently notable. Shadowjams (talk) 21:49, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Luc Harvey

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )



Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Was a short-term MP and now is leader of a political party that has never fielded a candidate in an election. West Eddy (talk) 22:26, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable under WP:POLITICIAN as a sitting MP. 117Avenue (talk) 03:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Am I misunderstanding WP:POLITICIAN? I thought that wasn't enough to establish notability. West Eddy (talk) 03:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, as soon as someone becomes an MP or MLA they get an article. All the winners in Alberta's provincial election had articles within 24 hours, you've nominated a federal representative with over two years service. 117Avenue (talk) 05:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Where is that in policy? WP:POLITICIAN 3 says the opposite. West Eddy (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The operative word in part 3 is "local", which does not apply to Harvey. Part 1 (as a member of a national parliament) applies here. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 20:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 20:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:POLITICIAN and my comments above. A one-term MP is notable. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * speedy keep - Consider my nomination withdrawn, with my apologies. West Eddy (talk) 06:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You really need to do your homework before nominating for AfD. It could be considered to be nominated in bad faith. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.