Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luc Venet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Luc Venet

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable bio with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Books authored:, Sources: , Cites ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply Those links exist because the subject translated a book and wrote a book. I believe that this subject is not notable. There are no Reliable sources to establish notability for this subject. Also, the article cites a book that Luc Venet wrote - this is not a reference. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 11:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There are no Reliable sources to establish notability for this subject.
 * Really? How do you know? What type of search have you done? Maybe you could share the results of your hard work with the community if it proves your point. I can't think of any legitimate reason why you wouldn't have done so. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 19:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Please calm down a bit, people. Attacks on the habits of the nominator are uncivil and unhelpful. Direct your responses towards the subject of the nomination. Best, RayAYang (talk) 01:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Being a friend or co-author here of a notable person does not make one notable. My Google check only shows 2 books coauthored by this person here He is Not notable. Artene50 (talk) 07:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jossi. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 16:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment No one can vote twice goethan on the same page. (only comment) As I said Venet fails WP:RS and has only minor WP:N Artene50 (talk) 09:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.