Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca (2021 film) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a recreation. The content is effectively the same, I'll also protect this from being recreated prior to it passing NFF. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Luca (2021 film)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough coverage for a standalone article yet, per WP:NFF. Topic already has a working draft at Draft:Luca (2021 film) BOVINEBOY 2008 23:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Couldn’t this technically pass as a Speedy Delete since it is just a recreation of an article deleted per an AfD? Foxnpichu (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; lack of coverage; if it is almost exactly the same as the previous incarnation then please speedy delete and maybe even SALT for now Spiderone  09:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * For note, I have tried speedying recreations of drafts in the past and they are almost always declined and taken to AfD. I just took out the middle man this time. I imagine if this snows that we can close early. BOVINEBOY 2008 11:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah I think people have worked out that it's a bit of a loophole in the system unfortunately. Spiderone  16:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NFF, just a case of WP:TOOSOON. KylieTastic (talk) 17:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy Delete - The production of this film is still not notable, and it looks about the same as it did the last time. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It's effectively the same, so I'm going to speedy and close this. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.