Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Berardi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 16:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Luca Berardi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two different editors have PRODded this article and a third nominated it for speedy. I deprodded it once and contested the speedy. I'm taking it to AFD as there's clearly a desire to delete. However this is procedural on my part and I believe the page should be kept. There are multiple references which demonstrate significant coverage in reliable sources, particularly for the subject's work as a TV host. There are issues with the article, but they can be resolved through editing. pburka (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - this highly promotional article has been deleted, under a variety of names such as Luca G Beradi, before both as Draft and as an article but it keeps on being resurrected. Fails WP:GNG makes no claim to any significant notability and if deleted needs to be salted. See also various name variants .  Velella  Velella Talk 22:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - the article needs to be rewritten, almost from scratch, and I would question the significance of the roles that Berardi has had; that being said, I don't feel qualified to determine the significance of Kenyan television shows, there are multiple WP:RS in the article in its present form, and it's possible that, from the perspective of a Kenyan Wikipedian, his roles could meet WP:NACTOR. As an inclusionist, I'd prefer to err on the side of retention. - Brother Bulldog (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - promotional piece for a non notable subject falling short of all notability criteria.Celestina007 (talk) 10:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: This really should have been AfDed months ago instead of the inappropriate repeated draftifications, PRODs, and CSDs. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable youth.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. The tone may be promotional, there may be a history of behavioral issues, and he may not pass WP:NACTOR, but I urge editors to look at the sources. Whether we like it or not, he's been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Google News easily turns up more, in multiple languages, over a period of several years. This ought to be sufficient to pass WP:GNG, which is more important than any topic-specific guidelines. Unless someone explains why this is WP:NOT, I don't see how the subject could be non-notable. pburka (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable based on multiple news articles from reputable sources featuring the subject as a person of interest.  Laanders (talk) 09:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I've added a reftalk to keep your references inside this AFD. An alternative would be to use inline links instead. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Very weak keep. There was an awful lot of puff in this article, and many, many claims which were simply not in the citations that are included. There was also a great deal of completely irrelevant content - for instance, a level 3 award being issued by the London College of Music, a minor London music school, is not notable in and of itself. However, I've now cleaned a lot of the article up, and what remains is existent in reliable sources. As a consequence, I feel it should be kept. Naypta ☺ &#124; ✉ talk page &#124; 12:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Judging from the article, he needs more press coverage, he can be deleted now and be re-created when more information is released by the press. Editoneer (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * How much press coverage would you consider to be enough? GNG only requires "multiple" sources. By my count, there are seven articles included in the references, and three more identified by User:Laanders above. pburka (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Apologises, I didn't looked this youngling up to find references. Editoneer (talk) 06:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He meet WP:BASIC per above sources posted by other users. 37.111.43.38 (talk) 12:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   15:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 18:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - He does meet WP:BASIC per presented sources. Also WP:GNG applies.BabbaQ (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.