Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Iaconi-Stewart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like coverage is good enough to justify an article. If the article works better when focused on the model plane and not its creator (i.e the ONEEVENT concern), I'd say that this is a change to be discussed on the talk page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Luca Iaconi-Stewart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I wrote this article, however, on second thought I'm not sure if this really meets GNG. BlueSalix (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 2.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete living person notable for only one event, and even then it is a very trivial event.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * agreed, thanks BlueSalix (talk) 20:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I don't think in my 11 years on Wikipedia that I have ever voted to keep an article against the wishes of the editor who started it, but there's a first time for everything. This is an entirely well-sourced article that appears to pass the depth of coverage demanded by WP:GNG. There are several articles in reliable secondary sources entirely devoted to the subject. I don't think we could ask for more than that.  A  Train ''talk 22:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - The subject received focused coverage by multiple sources. This meets GNG. Fieari (talk) 04:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, isn't this covered by WP:ONEEVENT so its the model plane that may be notable and could warrant an article not the maker? Coolabahapple (talk) 13:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.