Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Lazar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 17:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Luca Lazar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:V. Although a previous AfD concluded the subject was likely notable the article cites only a single source for a quote. A Google failed to yield anything that resembles in depth coverage from reliable sources. Since WP:V is POLICY and thus trumps guidelines including GNG and ARTIST the article is fatally flawed in its current condition. It is also grossly promotional to the point where it might arguably be a candidate for speedy deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move to Draft at best as being exhibited at the National Museum (seems to be the best outstanding museum listed) certainly satisfies WP:CREATIVE and this seemingly will need better attention and work. SwisterTwister   talk  04:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.