Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Moreira (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Luca Moreira
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is another serious case of WP:SOAPBOX and also (likely) WP:PAID. This article is a WP:PIG, full of unreliable sources and paid articles to create the impression that this person is notable, but he isn't. I can analyze source by source, but I can tell you people, that this article can only "deceive" those who don't speak Portuguese. I can tell you this, because in the Pt.WP, this article was not only deleted, but also salted after several SOCKs tried to recreate it over and over. The person behind these attempts, created numerous accounts, and the master account (ironically called "Lucamoreira") had to be blocked and globally locked. This is even more serious, because all this accounts and this article are linked to the BreakTudo Awards. Several people, paid for this organization, tried to use WP to promote their awards and the people linked to them. It is easy to determine that the creator of this article is linked to this organization, by simply looking into their talk page. Every time someone tries to delete one of their article, the process is plagued by several new accounts (many of them SOCKs or MEATs) voting to keep the article. That happened here both times their main article, BreakTudo Awards, went thought a AfD (see the first AfD and the second AfD) and also in the Pt.WP (See that the main account trying to recreate it in pt.WP was a SOCK). Again, none of the references in this article are from reliable sources. Additionally, many of them are simply paid articles that use the same pictures and also the same/similar text. Also, don't be surprised if this AfD is "invaded" by several new accounts, desperately voting for this article to be kept. This is what happens whenever one of the BreakTudo Awards-related articles goes through an AfD. Moreover, it's important to notice that this article went through an AfD before, and was deleted (see here). Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Brazil.  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 01:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, per pretty blatant and persistent WP:NOTHERE by whoever *really* wants this article to exist. BrigadierG (talk) 01:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, noting the sock activity and sourcing concerns brought up by nom (whose evaluation of Portuguese sources I trust far more than whatever I can do with Google Translate). I did I run sources [2] and [3] through translate and they seem vaguely effusive, although the post-translation grammar is suboptimal. Ovinus (talk) 02:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with source assessment above. Oaktree b (talk) 12:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Journalism.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nominator’s source assessment. NMasiha (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.