Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Broussard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. But if you want to actively work on it,, I'm happy to provide it as a Draft. Star  Mississippi  02:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Lucas Broussard

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While accomplished, does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS. Was redirected as per recent AfDs for Daniel Tioumentsev and Articles for deletion/Sophia Baram.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion due to previous PROD Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:49, 6 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Luxembourg,  and Washington.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: The biggest ding for this page is that WP:NHSPHSATH indicates "High school and pre-high school athletes are notable only if they have received, as individuals, substantial and prolonged coverage," but I could be persuaded to keep because the basic guidelines on WP:NSPORT note "sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject" and the referenced KING 5 piece certainly meets that in my opinion. Here, I think WP:NHSPHSATH outweighs the basic guidelines of WP:NSPORT. I think, assuming Broussard chooses to continue his atheletic career, he will become notable enough for an article but is not currently and we should not keep articles in place based on speculation about an individual's future.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * This should at least be draftified. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.