Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Oil School of Racing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus regarding the school and delete regarding the series. If someone thinks there is material worth merging, leave me a message and I'll temp-undelete the series's article for that. Regards  So Why  07:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Lucas Oil School of Racing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Prodded, but WP:SPA creator removed with no reason given. Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because the articles are tightly linked:Peter Rehse (talk) 17:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)



Support I agree that this page is also non-notable. Boleyn (talk) 17:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

I removed the notification per the notification language after updating information and adding another external reference. Apart from age of the organization, this article is no more or less subjectively notable than articles for similar organizations, Bob Bondurant School of High Performance Driving or Skip Barber Racing School. The latter has had outstanding issues noted as of 2011/2012, but no action has been taken on it and it has not be nominated for deletion. The Skip Barber Racing School article is also several years out of date, with dead links and fewer references than the Lucas Oil School of Racing article. Altemus Prime (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Comment, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a good argument in a deletion discussion. Could you please comment on how you feel it meets WP:NOTABILITY? And do you have a connection to this company, as I see all your edits have been on this topic? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 05:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  10:45, 23 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Since this concerns two articles....
 * Weak keep the school, delete the series. The school has attracted articles in NBC Sports, Road & Track and Digital Trends. The race series: [sound of crickets]. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  17:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the school Del the series per above. School is notable.  d.g. L3X1  (distænt write)   )evidence(  12:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete both as spam. Just advertorial pages on unremarkable business / promotional activities. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete both per WP:NOTSPAM. The sources provided are human interest pieces that don't have critical commentary on the business. Weighing the totality of WP:ORG, which tells us to consider the type of coverage to determine if it meets GNG. I don't consider the coverage to be substantial enough to overcome the promotionalism concerns here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep school, delete or merge series per Clarityfiend's argument. -ZarosFlok (talk) 01:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.