Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Public Affairs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:49, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Lucas Public Affairs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

10-person PR firm does not appear to meet WP:CORP. All the sources are press release reposts, broken links, primary sources, etc. that do not pass WP:V. CorporateM (Talk) 22:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (gas)  @ 23:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 16:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The article is a mix of some material about the firm and a lot of biographical material about its founder and associates and their other activities. But no evidence that the firm itself meets the notability requirements. AllyD (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find anything that would fulfill WP:CORP.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP; only passing mentions found at Google News Archive. Most of the article is about the people rather than the company, but they do not appear to be notable either. --MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.