Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Wirth

Lucas Wirth was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

(and redirect Jughashvili Jeannie) This is an obvious hoax. &#8212;No-One Jones (m) 01:37, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC) Bold textDon't Delete. Don't Delete He is well known among the Paquins
 * Delete. --*drew 02:38, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inaccurate. No potential to become encyclopedic. Not funny enough for BJAODN. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 02:39, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Dude, we know you're 24.93.213.84. Don't try to hide it, it shows up in the history. - Vague Rant 03:10, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Antandrus 03:18, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Utterly stupid, too. I want back those 10 seconds I spent looking at it.  Does the subliterate troll author ever manage to fool anyone?  Geogre 03:51, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * I swear I've read this on wikipedia before. Delete then, delete now, delete always. -R. fiend 04:01, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Appears to be bogus, and either way not notable. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:25, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gamaliel 18:11, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * DeleteWolfman 05:27, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vandalism.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:52, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.