Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucia Liljegren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Lucia Liljegren

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This WP:FRINGEBLP has been here for a while despite really thin sourcing and almost no mention of the person in the sources used in the article. Searching for sources that profile her or offer what we could use as sources for WP:BLP has turned up vanishingly little. I think this is an inheritance of the climate change battles of 10 years ago and the article does not stand the test of time. Oh, seems to straightforwardly fail WP:PROF as well. jps (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The sources don't really mention the subject, GNG not met. Toadspike (talk) 14:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete GNews turns up a press-release, Newspapers brings up hits from 1917 and 1943, so unrelated. Scholar has a few mentions in alumni newsletters and the like. Non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Well put. No reason to keep this. --Hob Gadling (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I was thinking of bringing this article to AfD myself. We've a straightforward fail of WP:PROF and no other way to make a reasonable argument that a general encyclopedia needs it. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per the comment of Oaktree b. Brian O'Conner  23:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.