Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucidity (festival)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. ‑Scottywong | gab _ 21:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Lucidity (festival)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent media to qualify for an article. (and, if the content is stripped back to only sourced material that is even minimally notable, not much left) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Minimally notable, like you say, though it does need work on the ad-like writing style ☯ Bonkers The Clown  \(^_^)/  Nonsensical Babble  ☯ 07:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, only found one non-primary source regarding the subject. Insufficient significant coverage from multiple reliable sources to indicate notability; fails WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Review of Lucidity 2012 from Afromonk.com Review of Lucidity 2012 from LostinSound.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fullspektrum (talk • contribs) 06:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Are those websites reliable sources?
 * Please look at WP:SIGCOV; basic notability is determined by significant coverage in non-primary reliable sources.
 * If these sources are not reliable, and fall under WP:SPS, then regardless of the length of the review, those sources could not be used to indicate notability.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article is God awful but the subject is notable and is referenced in some mainstream news sources. It just needs some work. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Festival is an important example of a burgeoning counterculture on the West Coast and is featured prominently in the documentary series The Bloom: A Journey Through Transformational Festivals. Wes! &#149; Tc 17:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Is that a reliable source?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Local event (with only local coverage) does not meet WP:GEOSCOPE (and a "recurring" event needs to happen more than once).  Mini  apolis  01:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - coverage in Santa Barbara Independent which seems to be a WP:RS. Festival happened last year and is billed as happening again this year as far as I can see. That makes it a recurring event. Article needs work but it meets inclusion criteria Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 10:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.