Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucien Smith (attorney)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Lucien Smith (attorney)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for office. As always, an election candidate is not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles because candidate -- if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced claim that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons independent of his candidacy, then he must win the election, not merely run in it, to become eligible for one. But what we have here for sourcing is two primary sources (his own campaign website and a press release), two dead links and just one news article about the launch of his campaign -- and one news article is not enough coverage to get him over GNG in lieu of failing NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 00:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and our various biographical criteria.  FalconK (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.