Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucilia nitens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Lucilia nitens

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This disambiguation page appears to have been created purely based on the fact that "Lucilia nitens" was originally listed at both Lucilia (fly) and Lucilia (plant). However, on closer inspection, it turns out that the former article had erroneously listed a number of plant species, one of which was "Lucilia nitens Less.". Thus the basis for this disambiguation page completely disintegrates. (This is apart from the fact that nobody had ever tried to create either species articles, so it's no wonder this error went by unnoticed) Monster Iestyn (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, this could be G14'ed as a dab page that does not disambiguate any article - both entries are redlinks without meeting WP:DABRED. MB 21:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I had considered speedy delete under G14, but wasn't sure if "Regardless of title, disambiguation pages that disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages" (from WP:G14) covered a disambiguation page consisting entirely of redlinks or not. Monster Iestyn (talk) 13:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.