Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucilla Borio

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE (CSD rule R2). jni 17:33, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Lucilla Borio
This was created by User:Lucilla Borio. As it was clearly autobiographical, I moved it to her empty userpage in the absence of any very obvious notability. Perhaps somebody else could say whether the woman deserves an article after all. In that case, a replacement article could perhaps be rewritten. Otherwise the remaining redirect should be deleted. / u p p l a n d 18:42, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * We need somebody in the ecovillage community to tell if she's of any notability. --Preisler 20:48, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete case R2. If she is notable enough to deserve an article, it is important that someone else write it.  No autobiographies is a principle worth defending.  Rossami (talk) 08:34, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * This belongs on Redirects for deletion, not here.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:18, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)