Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucille Fuchs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Lucille Fuchs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:PROF. A search for secondary sources to support notability was not fruitful. Many of the links in the article link to the landing pages of major websites, where nothing is written about this person. None of this author's published works appear notable. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * please consider that she could be sorted by the name "Lucy Fuchs" for instance: on Google Scholar Holzywood (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete total and complete failure of meeting academic notability guidelines. The Google scholar link provides nothing even close to enough citations to suggest we might have someone with notable impact in a discipline.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree...seems to be archetypical "average professor". Agricola44 (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please consider the multiple aspects of the persona, not only the academic background Holzywood (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies, but "multiple aspects of the persona" doesn't mean anything in the context of this discussion. A motion has been made to delete this article based on lack of notability. The article will only be kept if this concern can be addressed. Agricola44 (talk) 21:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Doesn't seem to meet academic notability or general notability or any particular other guideline. To the extent that "multiple aspects of the persona" has a meaning, it would be to use multiple notability guidelines.  Does the proponent wish to offer one that we have overlooked?  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Charitable of you, but that's not what it means. It is special pleading and what it basically means is "I know this person is not notable, but she's really great and deserves an article on WP, so please insert special plea here". There are gajillions of these "fanpage"-type articles on WP and they're appearing faster all the time. Agricola44 (talk) 15:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - The author/proponent is a single-purpose account. Are they a family member, or being paid by the subject?  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope boss. Just a fan Holzywood (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.