Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucinda Southworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Larry Page. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Lucinda Southworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Why should Southworth have an article based on the reasoning that she is the wife of a billionaire(Larry Page)? Un-notable. She hasn't even done anything 'important', other than marry Larry Page, of course. Bejinhan Talk   12:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC) *Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability --SuperHappyPerson (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:06, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Larry Page. She is clearly a remarkable woman (Stanford Ph.D.), but she has not achieved notability for anything other than marrying Page. --MelanieN (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 03:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue and also added in two new EL's. Silver  seren C 03:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Larry Page per MelanieN. I see no sign that she passes WP:PROF or has any other independent notability, and notability is not inherited. But a merge and a redirect are cheap. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge or Redirect to Larry Page. Deletion would inconvenience the thousands of readers who look at her article each month. Abductive  (reasoning) 09:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge. Concur with the above reasoned arguments. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 21:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC).
 * Merge. As above. Jonathan Luckett (talk) 15:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.