Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucius Cornelius Sulla Magnus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Magnus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Identical with Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix (consul 33): both are described as brothers of Faustus Cornelius Sulla (consul 31). The surname 'Magnus' must be incorrect. Avilich (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article contains nothing that isn't in the other article, and there is no explanation for the surname "Magnus", which as far as I can tell doesn't occur in any source readers are likely to have consulted, and so isn't a likely search term.  Since the article has never cited any sources, and I can't find this form of the subject's name in likely reference works or in epigraphy, it's impossible to determine where "Magnus" comes from—and so I don't see it helping anyone locate or distinguish this particular Sulla.  If any evidence for this surname is discovered, this could be re-created as a redirect.  P Aculeius (talk) 14:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per above, or redirect out of caution. Bearian (talk) 17:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesnt meet WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 (talk) 07:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if it could be proved this person was not the same as the consul of 33, what claim of notability does he have? Note: Roman Senators were not elected officials; they were individuals whose wealth entitled them to be one of 600 members of the Roman Senate. Most could be described as "non-entities" (with a tip of the hat to Ronald Syme, who sometimes applies that adjective to Senators who are not proconsuls, consuls, or appointed to imperial offices). -- llywrch (talk) 23:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.