Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Dog Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Lucky Dog Publishing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Zero refs. I can't find substantial RS coverage. Tagged for notability four years ago this month, but has just continued to reside on the Project without attention or deletion. Created by a 1-edit-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - it hasn't been improved any in its four years of notability tagging, so can it already! 75.185.45.77 (talk) 13:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. 6-year-old publisher of a three bi-weekly local papers, with aggregate circulation in 2009 of 11k, according to their website. Web searches find directory listings and not much else. Fails WP:GNG. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.