Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Man (Emerson, Lake & Palmer song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 01:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Lucky Man (Emerson, Lake & Palmer song)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NSONGS nothing here to validate notability of the song, no context in article (not to mention cites/references), can be merged into main article (not tat there is anything to merge) Alan  -  talk  23:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC) *Redirect to Emerson, Lake & Palmer (album); does not rise to notability for an independent article. J04n(talk page) 02:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have expanded the article and added sources.  Gongshow  Talk 09:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Changing !vote to Keep per Gongshow's expansion. Kudos to Gongshow on a job well done. J04n(talk page) 10:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BEFORE, WP:SONG, and WP:HEY. I'm only a few years older than User:Alankc, but I am old enough to recall that this song was a big radio hit, and remains so on the oldies stations. Bearian (talk) 19:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC) P.S. Thanks to User:Gongshow for rescuing this one. Bearian (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:NSONGS. Bravedog (talk) 00:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nice work, Gongshow--considering nominating this for a DYK, if you're at 5x expansion! Drmies (talk) 00:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I actually nominated it for DYK just a couple hours before your suggestion. Great minds...!  Gongshow  Talk 02:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep this nice history preserving article! Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep The band's first single (and a hit for the fledgling supergroup). It definitely passes the notability laws and gives a good bit information about the song's significance. I'm glad someone finally made an article for it. Krobertj (talk) 20:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Besides other indications of notability, a cursory compliance with WP:BEFORE would demonstrate that the song charted (e.g., and thus meets WP:NSONGS, not to mention that there are plenty of 3rd party sources discussing the song to meet Rlendog (talk) 01:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. Another waste of time.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.