Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Rose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Lucky Rose

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a musician, based entirely on one primary source and one blog with no evidence of reliable source coverage in real media, of a musician with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The claim that his single charted in the Canadian Hot 100 is proving unverifiable -- while a press release from his own record label has it entering the charts at #39, Billboard's own website fails to corroborate that, and I can't find any other valid source that does so either (I found a blog which gives it a #97 peak, but that's neither acceptable sourcing in and of itself, nor a high enough chart position to confer a presumption of notability in the absence of a demonstrable GNG pass.) And on a Google News search, I can't find hide nor hair of even one piece of reliable source coverage about him. As always, a musician does not get a "no sourcing required" freebie just because passage of an NMUSIC criterion is claimed -- he has to earn one by virtue of reliable source coverage which verifies passage of the criterion. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 23:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources, so fails GNG. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: AllMusic, a reliable website, confirms the #97 peak for this single here. Maybe the #39 peak refers to the Canadian Country Music Charts – either way, still fails notability. Richard3120 (talk) 14:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this suggests at least better notability improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.