Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky commando films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Failed to establish that WP:ORG is met by the sources. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Lucky commando films

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No third-party reliable sources to indicate notability; references are all the same recycled press releases. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: The news articles mentioned in this page are independent sources of information and are not press releases Jiasally (talk) 09:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Anyone glancing at the reference section can see that is clearly not the case. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not enough to pass GNG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH imo. Kolma8 (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep produced 7 big budget movies, passes GNG. Tictictoc (talk) 06:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment You may want to take a closer look at those 7 "big budget" movies. None of those are anywhere near a big-budget movie; they're either shorts, web series, or music videos. The last one in the list (which I've removed) was dated as "2022" and didn't seem to exist, as the links are either broken or go to different articles. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 14:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 14:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

              
 * Keep: The production company is a notable company has produced many web series, films and short movies music Albms. It has enough citations on trusted reliable, independent resources such as: passes WP:NCORP

Powerfultample (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: The page recycles sources repeatedly and makes films that don't have Wikipedia articles. — Ð W (T·C) 20:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The production company is a notable company has produced . It has enough citations on trusted reliable, independent resources such as: Nabutiger123 (talk) 12:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) — Nabutiger123 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment "Such as" what? OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Those news articles are engaged in this, they have big all the articles and are independent, these articles can be trusted . — Ppp00007 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment Another SPA with an argument that doesn't make any sense. Before you go creating further throwaway accounts, bear in mind I've opened a sockpuppet investigation. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:34, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite the vocal single edit accounts, there does not seem to be any reason to keep this. My search did not find anything. There is are no other language articles, given that they produce in languages other then English, it would seem self evident that don't meet Hindi notability. Jeepday (talk) 17:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails NCOMP/GNG. I did my own BEFORE and the company has next to zero visibility. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, etc. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.