Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky the Koala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Caulde 10:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Lucky the Koala

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable animal, in news for one incident, see WP:BLP1E. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete No, no, no... Not a chance. Non-notable and written like an advertisement. The Rolling Camel (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * CSD candidate: A3; this article doesn't have any significance for justification for being in the namespace. Caulde  17:29, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy, G11. Tagged as such. Tavix (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I read the Field guide to proper speedy deletion today. and I can't see a valid speedy in either of those criteria. A3 doesn't apply as it has content that could be called a stub, A11 doesn't apply because it's not promoting anything (not blatantly anyway) and BLP obviously doesn't apply because it's a koala and not a person. - Mgm|(talk) 19:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No content could be interpreted as "no substantive or meaningful content" - as in this case. Caulde  19:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Its not like it matters, it's going to be deleted anyway. At this point, I could even argue WP:SNOW. Tavix (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, per above. --Bobak (talk) 19:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. This doesn't look like a valid CSD candidate. Epbr123 (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, mainly per WP:SNOW. You could argue A1 as there is virtually no context given. However, "virtually no" is not necessarily the same as plain "no." A3 doesn't readily apply to articles like these but rather to linkfarms and what-not. MuZemike  ( talk ) 22:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - why is this at AfD? Totnesmartin (talk) 23:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If this discussion is any indication, the koala's name is a misnomer. WP:NOT. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.