Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky the Pizza Dog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hawkeye (Clint Barton). Barkeep49 (talk) 04:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Lucky the Pizza Dog

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable fictional character TTN (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Hawkeye (Clint Barton). BOZ (talk) 15:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fictional chara. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. I'm not sure there's anything worth merging, but I'm not opposed to a redirect. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. You know... I was going to say simply redirect to Hawkeye (Clint Barton), but then I looked at the Hawkeye article to see how much he comes up...only in the reception. BUT, what a mention in the reception it was!  He was covered extensively in this WIRED article. That got me thinking that if this was praised so highly, there must be more out there, so I went to Comic Book Roundup to check.  Well, there are so many sites that actually chose to review this that there are too many to bother linking.  Here is the overall link, and you can see several mentions of him in there: .  His story also won the Eisner award in 2014.  Clearly a reception section should be created to capture some of this, but the sources WP:NEXIST based on this alone.  There's probably more, but this already meets GNG. (One could argue it should be changed to focus on the work, but that is not a deletion argument, that is an improvement.) -2pou (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fictional. Not a shred of analysis. Pure PLOT. Fails GNG and NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Is that based on the current state of the article or your review of discovered sources above? -2pou (talk) 23:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Allowing more time for discussion of sources brought up in the last day.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hawkeye (Clint Barton), where in #Reception, said Wired article already discusses Lucky. The dog is apparently closely linked to his fictional owner, but does not transcend him, i.e. a stand-alone article is overkill. – sgeureka t•c 13:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hawkeye (Clint Barton), where it receives all the attention it should. Onel 5969  TT me 15:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, per 2pou. -- GentlemanGhost  (séance)  02:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.