Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy's Heart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Lucy's Heart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of independent reliable resources. does not pass WP:NFILM Priyanjali singh (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Priyanjali singh (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Priyanjali singh (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment Hi, thanks for reviewing my article. I get your reasoning that it doesn't comply with WP:NFILM. However, it's pretty much impossible to include any more independent resources, as this is a relatively unknown film. I believe it does deserve its own entry because it was screened at the Shorts Seasons Summer festival as part of the official selection (see cite 1) and does include two actresses who are known for more mainstream work (Perpetua Kish and Olivia Harkin). You were so quick in your Afd marking that I hadn't gotten around to writing an article on Kish yet, but that will follow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjokhazard (talk • contribs) 07:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails WP:NFILM. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment The consensus seems to be it should be deleted, and I agree. I'm unable to make it pass WP:NFILM due to the lack of available publicly citable sources. In addition, WP:NFILM lays out what is considered "noteable" and Lucy's Heart as a film doesn't match those criteria. It is a shame. Perhaps a subcategory for niche films should be considered for which the criteria are somewhat less strict than laid out in WP:NFILM. Sjokhazard (talk) 14:28, 2 september 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree on this - it would be good to try to find some happy medium for short films, as they typically don't gain the coverage that full length films. It'll take a while to come to a consensus so this may take multiple discussions, but I highly recommend launching a discussion at WP:NFILM's talk page. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * @ Done, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(films)#Niche_films Let's see what comes out of it! Sjokhazard (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.