Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Alexander (newsreader)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (The Delete !vote like myself couldn't find anything yet stuff has turned up so it kinda makes both are !votes Moot, Sourcing isn't amazing but meh they're not mentions so I'm happy!, Thanks ) (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Lucy Alexander (newsreader)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable newsreader, The 2 cites in the article are simply mentions, and as far as I'm aware the "FindMyPast" shouldn't be used as cites, Searched on Google & Highbeam and found nothing, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources.  There are a few stories on Google News, but they seem to all be about different people named Lucy Alexander.  More specific searches turn up nothing usable.  It's possible there are hits that I didn't see because of aggressive filtering of false positives. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources: in-depth here, coverage here, here, here, easily meets the general notability guideline.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Good find .... but there's one problem .... Dailymail can't be used in any article unfortunately .... So you take away DM and all's you have is The Guardian ... So unfortunately she doesn't pass GNG unless you or someone can find something else, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Who says the Daily Mail can't be used? Do you think anything in the article is wrong?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Note: the Daily Mail has over a million circulation, whether it's a "tabloid" or not, it is a credible source for this type of article -- about an on-air TV personality (ie entertainment), which tabloids are usually good at.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Annoyingly I can't find it but I read somewhere it shouldn't be used, If I can be used I'll happily withdraw but I'll ask at the help desk . – Davey 2010 Talk 02:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well I agree the DM shouldn't be trusted for technical subjects, but for entertainment -- that's what they're all about. What about Hello magazine? Or what about this source?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It was 2-3 years I saw it but I vaguely remember it was something about them making stuff up and that they shouldn't be trusted but I can't recall where I even read it as it was a long time ago, Well I've used Metro and Hello for others so perfect thank you :), I'll withdraw in a minute, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 02:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.